Do you have to be an expert in a certain literary form or a specific subject for you to have the right to make an article critique? While being an expert weighs a lot on the credibility of the article critique, it is not always the case. The best person to write such an article is always you, the reader.
But an article critique should not be about bashing or writing more about the negative aspects or points of an article. In writing such an article, the writer should first read the subject article with a critical mind. This does not mean he should only be aware of the shortcomings of the article. He must also take note of the high points or the positive factors that make the article worth reading.
One important tip before plunging into writing an article critique is to learn more about the article’s author. By knowing the background of the author, the critic can find out the reasons behind the style of the writing of the article, its tone, the format, the setting and the characters, especially if it’s a literary type of article.
How long should be the article critique written? In most cases, it depends on the length of the article being critiqued. But more importantly, the length depends on the number of the important negative and positive components of the article that should be critiqued. The writer should only point out the glaring errors, shortcomings or the positive points that are truly worth mentioning in an article critique.